Traits regarding the individuals, stratified by HIV status, are shown in dining Table 1. Almost all of men (60.8 percent) considered by themselves HIV-negative, 153 guys (26.5 percent) HIV-positive, and 73 (12.7 percent) would not understand their HIV status at period of enrolment. The entire median age ended up being 37 (IQR 30–43) years. HIV-positive guys had been dramatically older and reported more lovers than HIV-negative or HIV-unaware males (P Table 1 Characteristics of 577 males who possess intercourse with males, stratified by self-perceived HIV status, Amsterdam, 2008-9
Online and offline partner and partnership faculties
Traits of on the internet and offline lovers and partnerships are shown in dining Table 2. The age that is median of lovers had been 34 years (IQR 28–40). In comparison to offline lovers, more online partners were Dutch (61.3 percent vs. 54.0 per cent; P Table 2 traits of 1781 intimate lovers and partnerships of 577 males who’ve intercourse with guys, in the shape of how a participant founded the partnership, Amsterdam, 2008-9
In extra file 1: Table S1 faculties of partners and partnerships stratified by HIV status of individuals are shown. UAI had been a lot more typical in partnerships of HIV-positive guys (49 per cent) than in partnerships of HIV-negative men (13 percent) or men that are HIV-unaware28 per cent) (P dining Table 3 regularity of UAI by partner purchase (online or offline) by participant’s and partner’s HIV status
Association between online/offline dating and UAI
In univariate analysis, UAI had been much more prone to occur in on line than in offline partnerships (OR = 1.36 95 per cent CI 1.03–1.81) (Table 4). The HIV that is self-perceived for the participant ended up being highly connected with UAI (OR = 11.70 95 per cent CI 7.40–18.45). The result of dating location on UAI differed by HIV status, because may be seen best in Table 5. Continue reading “Traits for the individuals. Characteristics regarding the individuals, stratified by HIV status, are shown in dining dining Table 1.”